bursa escort - escort bursa - bayan escort - escort bayan
bursa escort - escort bursa - bayan escort - escort bayan
|
Tweet |
Türkiye’de de görev yapmış, Amerikan Merkezi Haber Alma Teşkilatı’nın (CIA) eski üst düzey isimlerinden Graham E. Fuller, 2015’te Cumhurbaşkanı Tayyip Erdoğan’ın gücünün sarsılmaya başlayacağını ileri sürdü.
Ortadoğu üzerine yazdığı analiz ve kitaplarla da tanınan Fuller, blogunda yazdığı son yazıda bölgenin ‘falına baktı.’
Fotoğraflar: Reuters
“Daha önce de, IŞİD’in bir devlet olarak yaşayabilir olduğuna inanmadığımı söyledim” diyen Fuller bu düşüncesini şöyle açıkladı: “Tutarlı ve işlevsel ideolojiden, ciddi siyasi ve sosyal kurumlardan, ciddi bir iderlik sürecinden, yönetimin karmaşık ve detaylı lojistiğini ele alma becerisinden ve bölgede devletlerarası ilişki kurma imkanından yoksunlar. Bunlara ek olarak, Irak ve Suriye’deki memnuniyetsiz Sunniler dışında, dünyadaki Sunni Müslümanların büyük bölümünü yabancılaştırdılar.“
Fuller, IŞİD’in savunduğu ideolojinin güçlenmemesi için kendisinin ve bölgedeki Müslümanların gözünde açıkça başarısızlığa uğraması gerektiğini de belirtti.
İran’ın ruhani lideri Hamaney…
ABD ve İran arasındaki ilişkilerin normalleşeceği tahmininde bulunan Fuller, “Her iki tarafın da başarılı olmak dışında seçeneği yok” ifadesini kullandı.
“İran ve Türkiye bölgedeki iki ‘gerçek’ hükümet” diyen Fuller’e göre Körfez ülkeleri İran’la ilişkini gözden geçirecek. Fuller’ın öngörüsü şöyle: “İran’ın bölgedeki etkisi, İsrail’in Filistin’i daimi etkisi altına alma çabasındaki zorluklar nedeniyle de artacak.“
“AKP iktidarının ilk 10 yılındaki parlak başbakanlığının ardından Erdoğan, yolsuzluk suçlamalarına battı ve kendisinin giderek mantıksızlaşan, despotlaşan ve hayalperestleşen yönetimini eleştiren ya da karşı çıkan herkese paranoyakça saldırdı” diyen Fuller’e göre Erdoğan, kurumlara zarar verme ve hem kendisinin hem de partisinin mirasını yok etme sürecinde.
Türkiye’deki köklü kurumların Erdoğan tarafından zayıflatıldığını söyleyen Fuller, bu kurumların Erdoğan halk nezdindeki desteğini kaybedene kadar Türkiye’yi ‘demokratik ve şiddet dışı yolda‘ tutacağına inandığını belirtti.
Rusya lideri Putin…
Rusya’nın, İran ile P5+1 ülkeleri arasındaki nükleer müzakereler ve Suriye’de oynadığı rolün önemine dikkat çeken Fuller, “Batı, Ukrayna’yı NATO’nun içine çekmekle, Moskova’yı zarar verici bir çatışma için provoke etmekte ısrarcı” ifadelerini kullandı.
Taliban’ın geçen ayki okul katliamından bir kare…
“Taliban bir İslami hareketten fazlası” diyen Fuller’e göre örgüt, ulusal güç dengeleri için önemli bir faktör.
Taliban’ın 2015 yılında gücünü ‘sahada’ da kuvvetlendirmenin yollarını arayacağı tahmininde bulunan Fuller, “Taliban işlevsel olarak dışlanamaz” diye yazdı. Fuller, Taliban’la yapılacak bir anlaşma ‘istikrar arayanan Pakistan’da‘ kısmen bu istikrarı sağlayabilir. (diken)
Graham Fuller’s Five Middle East Predictions for 2015
(January 3, 2015)
Only a fool offers longer term predictions about the Middle East.
I offer the following longer terms predictions about the Middle East for 2015.
1- ISIS will decline in power and influence. I have stated earlier that I do not believe ISIS is viable as a state; it lacks any coherent and functional ideology, any serious political and social institutions, any serious leadership process, any ability to handle the complex and detailed logistics of governance, and any opportunity of establishing state-to-state relations in the region. Additionally it has alienated a majority of Sunni Muslims in the world, regardless of deep dissatisfactions among Sunnis in Iraq and Syria. Ideally ISIS should fail and fall on its own, that is, without massive external, and especially Western, intervention that in some ways only strengthens its ideological claims. To be convincingly and decisively defeated, the idea of ISIS, as articulated and practiced, needs to demonstrably fail on its own and in the eyes of Muslims of the region.
2- The role of Iran as an actor in the region will grow. Despite all the hurdles, I feel optimistic about US negotiations with Iran. Both parties desperately need success in this regard. Normalization is ludicrously long overdue and necessary to the regional order. Furthermore, Iran and Turkey, are the only two “real” governments in the region today with genuine governance based on some kind of popular legitimacy—for all their faults. Turkey is democratic, Iran semi-democratic (presidential elections, while not fully representative, really matter.) These two states espouse many of the aspirations of the people of the region in ways no Arab leader does. The Gulf will be forced to accommodate itself to the reality of a normalized Iran; the two sides have never really been to war, despite all the occasional bellicose noises that have emerge from them periodically over the past century. Iran is post-revolutionary power with a vision of a truly sovereign Middle East free of western domination– none of the Arab states truly are. Iran’s influence in the region will also grow in supporting growing regional challenges to Israel’s efforts to keep the Palestinians under permanent domination.
3- President Erdoğan in Turkey will find his influence beginning to crumble in 2015. After a brilliant prime-ministership for the first decade of AKP power, he has become mired in corruption charges and has lashed out in paranoid fashion against any and all who criticize or oppose his increasingly irrational, high-handed, and quixotic style of rule. He is in the process of damaging institutions and destroying his and his party’s legacy. I continue to have faith that Turkey’s broader institutions, however weakened by Erdoğan, will nonetheless suffice to keep the country on a basically democratic and non-violent track until such time as Erdoğan loses public confidence—which could be sooner rather than later.
4- Russia will play a major role in diplomatic arrangements in the Middle East, an overall positive factor. Russia’s ability to play a key diplomatic (and technical) role in resolving the nuclear issue in Iran, and its important voice and leverage in Syria represent significant contributions to resolution of these two high-priority, high-risk conflicts that affect the entire region. It is essential that Russia’s role be accepted and integrated rather than seen as a mere projection of some neo-Cold War global struggle—a confrontation in which the West bears at least as much responsibility as Moscow. The West has insisted on provoking counter-productive confrontation with Moscow in trying to shoehorn NATO into Ukraine. Can you imagine an American reaction to a security treaty between Mexico and China, that included stationing of Chinese weapons and troops on Mexican soil?
5- The Taliban will make further advances towards gaining power within the Afghan government. After 13 years of war in Afghanistan the US failed to bring stability to the country as a whole, or to eliminate the Taliban as a major factor in the national power equation. The Taliban is much more than an Islamist movement; it has in many ways been a surrogate for nationalist Pashtun power within Afghanistan (although not accepted as such by all Pashtun). The Pashtun lost out big when the Taliban government was overthrown by the US in 2001; inclusion of mainstream Taliban within the new government is essential to future Afghan stability. The Taliban will seek to strengthen their power on the ground this year in order to enhance their powers of political demand in any possible future negotiations over power sharing. They cannot be functionally excluded. Desperately needed stability in Pakistan also depends in part upon such a settlement.
OK, that’s enough predictive risks for one year…
